Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

Idaho Continues to Place Unprecedented Barriers on Reproductive Health Care Across the State

BOISE – Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands (PPGNHI) in partnership with the American Civil Liberties Union of Idaho (ACLU), Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), and the law firm Ferguson Durham filed a lawsuit against the State of Idaho challenging House Bill 638, the Abortion Complications Reporting Act. This law require providers in the state to report on more than 37 new “complications,” ranging from medical conditions that have no link to abortion, like breast cancer, to the inability to come in for a follow-up appointment, which is not a medical condition. The reporting requirement doesn’t exist for any other medical procedure. The bill was signed into law by Governor C.L. “Butch” Otter in March. 

The law violates constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection by arbitrarily singling out one particular medical procedure and requiring invasive reporting that has nothing to do with protecting patient health care. Providers will now face potential criminal and civil penalties and professional discipline, which could result in the loss of their medical license, for non-compliance with these unconstitutional, vague and overreaching reporting requirements. Furthermore, the information gathered by these requirements is not protected from disclosure, putting patient and provider privacy at risk. 

This law is nothing but government interference designed to restrict Idahoans access to legal reproductive health care,” said Hannah Brass Greer, Chief Legal Counsel at PPGNHI. “This bill should never have passed in the first place as it has no basis in science and medicine. We deserve more from our elected leaders. At Planned Parenthood, safety is our top priority; HB 638 is not about patient safety. Abortion care is already incredibly safe. This is another attempt by Idaho politicians to shame and stigmatize people seeking abortion care and to spread the myth that abortion is dangerous. These reporting requirements burden patients and their medical providers and represent another example of government overreach by Idaho politicians. This law is unconstitutional and should be struck down.”

HB 638 ignores existing data on 45 years of safe and legal abortions by requiring the collection of irrelevant information about health “complications” arising from an abortion.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S District Court, District of Idaho. PPGNHI is represented by Deborah Ferguson and Craig Durham with Ferguson Durham, PLLC, Ritchie Eppink and Molly Kafka with the ACLU of Idaho, PPGNHI counsel Hannah Brass Greer, and PPFA.


This website uses cookies

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors use cookies and other tools to collect, store, monitor, and analyze information about your interaction with our site to improve performance, analyze your use of our sites and assist in our marketing efforts. You may opt out of the use of these cookies and other tools at any time by visiting Cookie Settings. By clicking “Allow All Cookies” you consent to our collection and use of such data, and our Terms of Use. For more information, see our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Settings

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors, use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to collect, store, monitor, and process certain information about you when you access and use our services, read our emails, or otherwise engage with us. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device. We use that information to make the site work, analyze performance and traffic on our website, to provide a more personalized web experience, and assist in our marketing efforts. We also share information with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners. You can change your default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of required cookies when utilizing our site; this includes necessary cookies that help our site to function (such as remembering your cookie preference settings). For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.



We use online advertising to promote our mission and help constituents find our services. Marketing pixels help us measure the success of our campaigns.



We use qualitative data, including session replay, to learn about your user experience and improve our products and services.



We use web analytics to help us understand user engagement with our website, trends, and overall reach of our products.