Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

At Planned Parenthood, the safety of patients is our top priority; SEA 340 is not about safety. This law is unconstitutional and that is why it was struck down.

INDIANAPOLIS – On Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Young struck down a medically unnecessary Indiana law that would have singled out abortion providers by requiring invasive and vague reporting. Calling the law a cruel intimidation tactic, Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK) — represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Indiana and Planned Parenthood Federation of America — filed a federal lawsuit against Senate Enrolled Act (SEA) 340 in 2018. 

The law would have required health providers to submit a report to the state when a patient seeks treatment for a wide range of health conditions after having an abortion. Medical providers who failed to submit such a report would have faced criminal penalties and possible jail time. SEA 340 is the latest in a series of abortion restrictions struck down by Indiana courts in recent years.  

Statement from Ken Falk, legal director, ACLU of Indiana:

“The definition of abortion complications in SEA 340, in such broad and uncertain terms, makes it next-to-impossible for medical providers to know what is or is not an abortion complication. This Indiana law would have burdened both patients and their medical providers with unnecessary reporting requirements. Reproductive health care, including abortion, should be safe and available to those who need it, and not restricted by certain politicians who want to ban abortions. We will continue to fight to protect Hoosiers’ access to abortion.”

Statement from Hannah Brass Greer, chief legal counsel, Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky:
“We are pleased the court has realized what we have known all along, that SEA 340 represents excessive government overreach and was designed to restrict Hoosiers access to reproductive health care. This bill should never have passed the state legislature as it has no basis in science and medicine. We deserve more from our elected leaders. In the middle of two public health crises — the COVID-19 pandemic and systemic violence against people of color — Indiana lawmakers should be working together to increase access to care, not trying to restrict it. The reporting requirements set by this law are another attempt by Indiana politicians to shame and stigmatize people seeking abortion services and to spread the myth that abortion is dangerous. At Planned Parenthood, the safety of patients is our top priority; SEA 340 is not about safety. This law is unconstitutional and that is why it was struck down.”


This website uses cookies

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors use cookies and other tools to collect, store, monitor, and analyze information about your interaction with our site to improve performance, analyze your use of our sites and assist in our marketing efforts. You may opt out of the use of these cookies and other tools at any time by visiting Cookie Settings. By clicking “Allow All Cookies” you consent to our collection and use of such data, and our Terms of Use. For more information, see our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Settings

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors, use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to collect, store, monitor, and process certain information about you when you access and use our services, read our emails, or otherwise engage with us. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device. We use that information to make the site work, analyze performance and traffic on our website, to provide a more personalized web experience, and assist in our marketing efforts. We also share information with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners. You can change your default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of required cookies when utilizing our site; this includes necessary cookies that help our site to function (such as remembering your cookie preference settings). For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.



We use online advertising to promote our mission and help constituents find our services. Marketing pixels help us measure the success of our campaigns.



We use qualitative data, including session replay, to learn about your user experience and improve our products and services.



We use web analytics to help us understand user engagement with our website, trends, and overall reach of our products.