Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

Bill Severely Undermines Women’s Access to Care

Planned Parenthood Federation of American (PPFA) strongly criticized the House of Representatives for passing H.R. 358, a dangerous bill that undermines women’s access to care, including eliminating protections for women seeking care in emergency situations. 

“This bill is a collection of dangerous ideas that will undermine women’s health,” said Cecile Richards, president of PPFA.  “Most devastating, the bill eliminates protections for patients seeking care in emergency circumstances, and would allow a hospital to deny lifesaving abortion care to a woman, even if a doctor deems it necessary.”

Planned Parenthood health centers are trusted nonprofit health care providers that provide professional, reliable, and quality health care, including birth control, lifesaving cancer screenings, annual exams, and STD testing and treatment to three million women and men across the country.  One in five American women has been to a Planned Parenthood health center at some point in her life.  In addition, six in 10 women who receive care from a women’s health center like those operated by Planned Parenthood consider it to be their main source of health care.

H.R. 358 is an attempt by House leaders to force consideration of policies that would drastically erode women’s health and reduce access to basic health care services and information.   

“House leaders just can’t keep their eye on the ball and focus on jobs and the economy,” said Richards.  “In fact, this bill will increase the economic burden on already struggling American families by eliminating health insurance provisions that could save them from bankruptcy.”

The Obama administration has issued a Statement of Administration Policy (SAP) opposing H.R. 358, indicating President Obama would veto H.R. 358 if it passes Congress.

The bill’s several anti-women’s health provisions include:

  • taking comprehensive health care coverage away from women
  • eliminating existing protections for women who need an abortion to save their lives
  • further expanding current refusal laws that undermine women’s health
  • creating loopholes that states and insurance companies could exploit to undermine the requirement that insurance companies provide birth control with no co-pays

Detailed Breakdown of H.R. 358:

H.R. 358 revives the failed Stupak amendment — a provision which would force health plans to drop comprehensive coverage in state health insurance exchanges, cutting off millions of women from the benefits they receive today.

Today, the majority of private health insurance plans include coverage of abortion care. Under H.R. 358, millions of women would be prevented from using their own money to purchase comprehensive health insurance coverage.  This is particularly true for women who work for small businesses or women who are self-employed and will get their health insurance through the new exchanges.

H.R. 358 codifies and significantly expands the already expansive refusal clause (also known as the Weldon amendment) without any patient protections. 

Under current law (through the 2004 Weldon amendment), hospitals, health care facilities, and insurance plans can refuse to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.  The Weldon amendment has no protections for patients to ensure they have access to care and information in a timely manner.  H.R. 358 codifies this unfair and discriminatory provision.
Worse than even Weldon, H.R. 358 allows health care entities to refuse to "participate in" abortion care.  This could mean that a hospital employee with no medical training or role in a patient’s treatment decisions could refuse to process bills, handle medical records, or even set up an examination room.  
H.R. 358 allows states to enact sweeping refusal laws that would allow health plans to refuse to cover women’s preventive services, including birth control, without cost-sharing— undoing a new protection that 66 percent of Americans support.

Most egregiously, this latest assault eliminates protections for patients seeking lifesaving abortion care in emergency circumstances.

Under the guise of claiming to protect medical workers, H.R. 358 actually overturns decades of precedent that guarantees people’s access to lifesaving emergency care,  including abortion care.

Since 1986, hospitals are prohibited from refusing to provide care to a patient in a life-threatening emergency situation.  Current federal law requires hospitals to at least  stabilize the patient, offering an essential protection for patients.  But under H.R. 358, this critical protection would no longer apply to a woman who needed an abortion to save her life. 

 

Source

Planned Parenthood Federation of America

Contact

Planned Parenthood Federation of America media office: 212-261-4433

Published

October 13, 2011

Updated

September 07, 2016

We and our third partners use cookies and other tools to collect, store, monitor, and analyze information about your interaction with our site to improve performance, analyze your use of our sites and assist in our marketing efforts. You may opt out of the use of these cookies and other tools at any time by visiting Cookie Settings. By clicking “Allow All Cookies” you consent to our collection and use of such data, and our Terms of Use. For more information, see our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Settings

We, and our third-party partners, use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to collect, store, monitor, and process certain information about you when you access and use our services, read our emails, or otherwise engage with us. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device. We use that information to make the site work, analyze performance and traffic on our website, to provide a more personalized web experience, and assist in our marketing efforts. We also share information with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners. You can change your default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of required cookies when utilizing our site; this includes necessary cookies that help our site to function (such as remembering your cookie preference settings). For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.

Marketing

On

We use online advertising to promote our mission and help constituents find our services. Marketing pixels help us measure the success of our campaigns.

User Feedback and Session Replay

On

We use qualitative data from LogRocket, UserZoom, Hotjar and AB Tasty to learn about your user experience and improve our products and services. LogRocket allows us to view session replays.